Abstract

This article examines competing Crimean Tatar, Russian and Ukrainian views of Crimean Tatar history as they have developed since the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014, via an examination of popular history and publistika. Crimean Tatar writing insists on the core principle of indigenous rights. In order to marginalise this discourse, Russian historiography adopts a neocolonial settler framing and a mythology of ‘ancient Russian’ Crimea, much of it derived from earlier Tsarist (late nineteenth century) and Soviet (1950s) historiography. Ukraine generally rather neglected the Crimean Tatar issue before 2014, but a new historiography of Crimean Tatar–Cossack cooperation and parallel state-building has emerged.

摘要

本文通过对通俗历史和publistika的考察，探讨了自 2014 年俄罗斯吞并克里米亚以来，克里米亚鞑靼人、俄罗斯人和乌克兰人对克里米亚鞑靼人历史的看法。克里米亚鞑靼人的写作坚持土著权利的核心原则。为了将这种话语边缘化，俄罗斯史学采用了新殖民主义定居者框架和“古代俄罗斯”克里米亚神话，其中大部分源自早期沙皇（19 世纪末）和苏联（1950 年代）的史学。乌克兰在 2014 年之前普遍忽视了克里米亚鞑靼问题，但出现了新的克里米亚鞑靼-哥萨克合作和平行国家建设史。