ABSTRACT This paper examines Tomáš Halík’s Patience With God: The Story of Zacchaeus Continuing in Us in light of Kierkegaard’s insistence upon conversion. Against forms of Christianity which would understand conversion as issuing, of necessity, from a rigorous thinking-through of objective proofs or of the ends of human desire, Kierkegaard insists upon a conversion that passes through offense at the God-man’s scandalous invitation. Though Halík approvingly cites Kierkegaard’s insistence upon a faith worked out in fear and trembling, and, like Kierkegaard, sees contemporaneity with Christ as possible only because of Jesus’ own experience of God-forsakenness, deep differences remain – especially with regard to the necessity of consciousness of sin. This paper will thus consider whether Halík’s ‘patience’ dulls the passion of faith and obscures the decisiveness of the moment, and whether Halík’s portrayal of Christian responsibility as solidarity leads not to Zacchaeus or to Socrates, but to Nicodemus.

中文翻译：

---

苏格拉底，尼哥底母和撒该人：基尔凯郭尔和哈利克关于conversion依和进攻

摘要本文根据基尔凯郭尔对转变的坚持，研究了托马斯·哈利克（TomášHalík）对上帝的忍耐：扎克修斯在我们里面继续的故事。反对将转化理解为必然是基于对客观证据或人类愿望目的的严格思考而产生的转化的基督教形式，克尔凯郭尔坚持认为，转化是通过在神人丑闻的邀请下通过进攻来实现的。尽管Halík赞成地引用了Kierkegaard对在恐惧和战栗中实践的信念的坚持，并且像Kierkegaard一样，认为与基督同时代只是因为耶稣自己对上帝的抛弃经验，但仍然存在着深刻的分歧-特别是在犯罪意识。