ABSTRACT This is an article about the persistence of a certain image of F.W.J. Schelling, an image that came to prominence not for the first time, but in a particularly decisive manner during the 1950s and has lingered on as an ideological template into which a number of contemporary Schelling-interpretations are still fitted. It is an image, I will argue, that crystallised in the Schelling-interpretations offered by three existentialists in the mid-1950s: Karl Jaspers, Gabriel Marcel and Paul Tillich. My aim in this article is, first, to identify and scrutinise their common features – the structural invariants, as it were, shared by Jaspers, Marcel and Tillich’s readings; secondly, to investigate how this reading took on its final, influential form in the mid-1950s when all three began to retrospectively consider Schelling’s place in the history of existentialist thought.

中文翻译：

---

宗教存在主义的狂热

摘要这是一篇有关FWJ Schelling形象的持久性的文章，该形象不是第一次出现，而是在1950年代以一种特别决定性的方式突显出来，并作为一种意识形态模板而持续存在，许多仍保留了当代的谢林解释。我将争辩说，这是在1950年代中期由三个存在主义者提出的席林解释中形成的图像。卡尔·贾斯珀斯，加布里埃尔·马塞尔和保罗·提利希。我在本文中的目的是，首先，要确定和审查它们的共同特征– Jaspers，Marcel和Tillich的读物所共有的结构不变式。其次，要调查此阅读的最终结果，