ABSTRACT This paper considers how Schelling’s earlier work functions as a fifth column for the Germano-Coleridgeans, particularly Coleridge himself and Green. I consider their engagement with Schelling’s First Outline in relation to the Hunterian collection bought by the Crown in 1799, which made the life sciences a public concern within the framework of how knowledge was to be organized. The paper explores the pressure the life sciences put on philosophy and the constraining of both, in the context of British Idealism, by religious imperatives that are internal, conceptual censors, and external (cultural and institutional) censors. Consolidating his work between the Romantic and Victorian periods, Green is a neglected figure in a progress from natural to political theology that coincides with a shift in British idealism from Schelling to a sanitized Hegel. Coleridge’s dialogue with and often expedient misrepresentations of Schelling are more complex, as he uses Schelling’s “Stufenfolge” to argue for a design in nature, yet is constantly troubled by a biodiversity and difference in nature to which Schelling was more open. Initially deploying Schelling to reconcile transcendental and natural philosophy, Coleridge can never entirely escape the trouble that biology causes philosophy and that philosophy (through Schelling) causes religion.

中文翻译：

---

免疫止赎：席林和英国理想主义

摘要本文考虑了谢林的早期工作是如何成为日耳曼·柯立芝人的第五专栏的，尤其是柯立芝本人和格林。我认为他们参与了谢林的《第一提纲》，该书与官方于1799年购买的Hunterian系列有关，这使生命科学成为如何组织知识的公众关注的话题。本文探讨了生命科学给哲学带来的压力，以及在英国理想主义背景下，内部，概念审查员和外部（文化和制度）审查员的宗教要求对二者的约束。在浪漫时期和维多利亚时期之间巩固他的作品，格林是从自然神学到政治神学的进步中被忽视的人物，这与英国理想主义从谢林转变为经过消毒的黑格尔相吻合。Coleridge与Schelling的对话（通常是虚假陈述）更为复杂，因为他使用Schelling的“ Stufenfolge”为自然设计辩护，但不断受到Schelling更加开放的生物多样性和自然差异的困扰。最初，通过部署谢林来调和先验哲学与自然哲学，科尔里奇永远无法完全摆脱生物学导致哲学和哲学（通过谢林）引起宗教的麻烦。但Schelling更加开放的生物多样性和自然差异不断困扰着他们。最初，通过部署谢林来调和先验哲学与自然哲学，科尔里奇永远无法完全摆脱生物学导致哲学和哲学（通过谢林）引起宗教的麻烦。但Schelling更加开放的生物多样性和自然差异不断困扰着他们。最初，通过部署谢林来调和先验哲学与自然哲学，科尔里奇永远无法完全摆脱生物学导致哲学和哲学（通过谢林）引起宗教的麻烦。