ABSTRACT Jeff Malpas’ book Experience and Place has become a significant landmark in philosophy. I take the publication of the revised and extended second edition of the book in 2018 as an opportunity to reflect on some key issues in Malpas’ thought. After briefly outlining Malpas’ commitment to topophilia and topoanalysis, I address, in the first part of my essay, the relation of place to subjectivity and normativity, pointing out certain shortcomings or ambiguities in Malpas’ account. I also critically discuss the omission of an account of migration, or, rather, immigration, which seems called for, especially if we realize that the inhabited place always comes with its limit or border, which implies that there is also a view from outside, and that we have moral obligations to the stranger and/or immigrant coming into our place from outside. In the second part of my essay, I engage Malpas’ argument according to which Heidegger ‘derived’ space from time. By an analysis of relevant texts in Heidegger, I show that this argument does not hold.

中文翻译：

---

地方与世界：论杰夫·马尔帕斯的《地方与体验》第二版

摘要 Jeff Malpas 的著作《经验与地方》已成为哲学的一个重要里程碑。我以2018年该书第二版修订和扩展的出版为契机，反思马尔帕斯思想中的一些关键问题。在简要概述了马尔帕斯对拓扑学和拓扑分析的承诺之后，我在文章的第一部分讨论了地方与主观性和规范性的关系，并指出了马尔帕斯描述中的某些缺陷或含糊之处。我还批判性地讨论了对移民的遗漏，或者更确切地说，移民，这似乎是必要的，特别是如果我们意识到有人居住的地方总是有其界限或边界，这意味着也有来自外部的观点，并且我们对从外面进入我们住所的陌生人和/或移民负有道德义务。在我的文章的第二部分，我参与了马尔帕斯的论证，根据海德格尔从时间“衍生”空间。通过对海德格尔相关文本的分析，我表明这个论证是不成立的。