ABSTRACT The publication of the revised edition of Jeff Malpas’s Place and Experience in 2018 gives the opportunity to reconsider this book (originally published in 1999) and the debates that it originally sparked. In this article, I focus on Malpas’s characterization of space as subjective, allocentric, and objective and I approach them in conjunction with other notions and considerations that, I suggest, are useful to expand and complement Malpas’s central theses. I approach the concept of subjective space in conjunction with the notion of coenaesthesis and with Heidegger’s notion of mineness (Jemeinigkeit); the concept of allocentric space by addressing Malpas’s critique of Nagel’s notion of detachment; and the concept of objective space through a discussion of the issue of perspective in light of Merleau-Ponty’s critique of Leibniz’s notion of ‘géométral’ (geometrized projection). These analyses pave the way for a discussion of some possible normative implications of the conception of place and subjectivity that emerges from Malpas’s Place and Experience against the background of Heidegger’s thought, and particularly in relation to Heidegger’s notion of dwelling (Wohnen).

中文翻译：

---

透视性、主体间性、规范性：论马尔帕斯的地方和经验

摘要 2018 年 Jeff Malpas 的《地方与经验》修订版的出版提供了重新考虑这本书（最初于 1999 年出版）及其最初引发的辩论的机会。在这篇文章中，我将重点放在马尔帕斯将空间描述为主观、自私和客观的特征上，并结合其他概念和考虑来处理它们，我建议这些概念和考虑有助于扩展和补充马尔帕斯的中心论点。我将主观空间的概念与共觉的概念和海德格尔的我的概念（Jemeinigkeit）相结合；通过解决马尔帕斯对内格尔超然概念的批评，提出了异中心空间的概念；根据梅洛-庞蒂对莱布尼茨的“几何投影”（几何投影）概念的批判，通过对透视问题的讨论，来了解客观空间的概念。这些分析为讨论在海德格尔思想背景下从马尔帕斯的地方和经验中出现的地方和主体性概念的一些可能的规范含义铺平了道路，特别是与海德格尔的居住概念（Wohnen）有关。