This study analyses the role of guardian of democracy performed by Indonesian Constitutional Court in reinterpreting the ideas of economic democracy. Although, in the 1945 Constitution, the economic democracy is well-derived from the mind’s eye of social justice which is established in Pancasila, some economic legislations tends to ignore the idea of economic democracy. Therefore, the Constitutional Court examined the disputed norms through constitutional review in order to maintain constitutional economic order. Besides, as elaborated by the Writer, the “ratio decidendi” stood behind some Constitutional Court’s verdicts used an approach which kept the two fundaments of democracy maintained. Apparently, as the guardian of democracy – not merely the protector of human rights, the Constitutional Court considered the conceptions of freedom and equality consecutively in its judicial verdicts. In this context, if liberty and equality are embodied at proportional measures in Indonesian democracy, the general welfare idealised in the Preamble of the 1945 Constitution will be promoted in our national life.

中文翻译：

---

经济民主的两种理念：印尼宪法法院作为民主卫士角色的语境分析

本研究分析了印尼宪法法院在重新诠释经济民主理念中扮演的民主守护者的角色。尽管在 1945 年的宪法中，经济民主很好地源自潘查西拉所确立的社会正义的思想之眼，但一些经济立法往往忽视了经济民主的理念。因此，宪法法院通过宪法审查对有争议的规范进行审查，以维护宪法经济秩序。此外，正如作者所阐述的那样，某些宪法法院判决背后的“判决比率”采用了一种保持民主的两个基本原则的方法。显然，作为民主的守护者——不仅仅是人权的保护者，宪法法院在其司法判决中连续考虑了自由和平等的概念。在这种情况下，如果自由和平等体现在印度尼西亚民主的比例措施中，那么 1945 年宪法序言中理想化的普遍福利将在我们的国民生活中得到促进。