当前位置: X-MOL 学术Indonesia Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The 1958 New York Convention in Indonesia: History and Commentaries Beyond Monism-Dualism
Indonesia Law Review Pub Date : 2019-12-31 , DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v9n3.583
John Lumbantobing 1
Affiliation  

This Article recounts a complete history of Indonesia’s implementation of the 1958 NY Convention. In particular, the elaboration and analysis focus on the comparison between related provisions in the 1999 Indonesian Arbitration Law and the Convention’s provisions as well as on several key Indonesian court decisions on enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Different than other writings in this area, this Article looks more closely at the practical issues which affect the way Indonesian courts apply or interpret the 1958 NY Convention, such as procedural hurdle and the judicial capacity to comprehend and understand basic concepts and principles of arbitration. The Article shows that those practical issues very much influence the implementation of the Convention in Indonesia while the courts oscillate between monism and dualism, and highlights the important role of doctrines in developing Indonesian jurisprudence on this area. In that vein, the conclusion here may also contribute in answering the wider question about the position of treaties under Indonesian law and how they are implemented in Indonesia beyond the superficial debate on monism-dualism.

中文翻译:

1958 年在印度尼西亚举行的纽约大会:超越一元论-二元论的历史和评论

本文讲述了印度尼西亚实施 1958 年纽约公约的完整历史。尤其是阐述和分析了 1999 年《印度尼西亚仲裁法》相关条款与公约条款的比较,以及印度尼西亚法院关于执行外国仲裁裁决的几项重要判决。与该领域的其他著作不同,本文更密切地关注影响印度尼西亚法院适用或解释 1958 年《纽约公约》方式的实际问题,例如程序障碍以及理解和理解仲裁基本概念和原则的司法能力。文章表明,这些实际问题非常影响印度尼西亚的公约实施,而法院则在一元论和二元论之间摇摆不定,并强调了学说在发展印尼这一领域的判例中的重要作用。在这方面,这里的结论也可能有助于回答关于条约在印度尼西亚法律下的地位以及它们如何在印度尼西亚实施的更广泛问题,而不仅仅是关于一元论-二元论的表面辩论。
更新日期:2019-12-31
down
wechat
bug