当前位置: X-MOL 学术Indonesia Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
IMPROVING THE ROLE OF EXPERTS UNDER INDONESIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE DUTCH LEGAL SYSTEM
Indonesia Law Review Pub Date : 2018-05-01 , DOI: 10.15742/ilrev.v8n1.385
Josua Sitompul 1
Affiliation  

This article attempts to scrutinize the role of expert under KUHAP and examine how Indonesian courts have interpreted and applied relevant rules and principles of the expert in selected cybercrime cases. It finds that the main role of expert in such cases is providing the courts with opinions on the legal and technical meanings of the legal provisions at stake and their contextualization in the cases. This raises a question whether law enforcement agencies comprehend the execution of the provisions. It also shows that law enforcement agencies are not always interested in getting digital forensic examination from which electronic evidence may be produced. It emphasizes that role of expert under KUHAP is equivocal and views the need to improve the role and principles. In order to improve the role of experts under Indonesian criminal law, the article describes and explains the salient features of expert evidence under Dutch law. The article concludes by making a series of recommendations.

中文翻译:

在印度尼西亚刑事诉讼法下改善专家的作用:从荷兰法律体系中吸取的教训

本文试图仔细审查 KUHAP 下专家的作用,并研究印度尼西亚法院如何在选定的网络犯罪案件中解释和应用专家的相关规则和原则。它发现,专家在此类案件中的主要作用是就相关法律条款的法律和技术含义及其在案件中的语境向法院提供意见。这就提出了一个问题,执法机构是否理解这些规定的执行。它还表明,执法机构并不总是对可能产生电子证据的数字取证检查感兴趣。它强调 KUHAP 下专家的作用是模棱两可的,并认为需要改进作用和原则。为了根据印度尼西亚刑法改善专家的作用,文章描述并解释了荷兰法律下专家证据的显着特征。文章最后提出了一系列建议。
更新日期:2018-05-01
down
wechat
bug