当前位置:
X-MOL 学术
›
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics
›
论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mincing Words: The Three Layers of the AKP’s Narrative on Kurdish Politics
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Pub Date : 2020-04-02 , DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2020.1754556 Mehmet Celil Çelebi 1
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Pub Date : 2020-04-02 , DOI: 10.1080/13537113.2020.1754556 Mehmet Celil Çelebi 1
Affiliation
Abstract In 2009–2015, the Justice and Development Party (AKP) put forward several initiatives to end insurgency in Kurdish majority areas. However, successive “openings” failed to make progress. The electoral and international goals of the AKP gradually became incongruent with the peace process, and the AKP espoused heavy-handed tactics in July 2015. The ups and downs of the process in 2009–2015 show that it was already fragile. Some causes of this fragility were external to the AKP, such as the opposition parties’ eagerness to use the process to poach nationalist voters and the PKK’s violence. However, I argue that the contradictory nature of the AKP’s narrative was also a crucial factor. The party’s earlier narrative required the strict separation of two layers: security policies to fight terrorists and democratization policies to address the legitimate grievances of citizens. However, the intersubjective strategies that it experimented later required a gray area between these two fields. The AKP, instead of changing strategies, has constructed a three-layered, contradictory narrative.
中文翻译:
言简意赅:正发党关于库尔德政治的三层叙事
摘要 2009 年至 2015 年,正义与发展党 (AKP) 提出了几项倡议,以结束库尔德多数地区的叛乱。然而,接连不断的“开工”均未能取得进展。正发党的选举和国际目标逐渐与和平进程不一致,正发党在 2015 年 7 月采取了强硬手段。2009 年至 2015 年的进程起伏表明它已经很脆弱。这种脆弱性的一些原因是 AKP 的外部原因,例如反对党急于利用这一过程来挖走民族主义选民和 PKK 的暴力行为。然而,我认为 AKP 叙述的矛盾性也是一个关键因素。党的早期叙述要求严格分离两层:打击恐怖分子的安全政策和解决公民合法不满的民主化政策。然而,它后来试验的主体间策略需要这两个领域之间的灰色区域。正发党没有改变战略,而是构建了一个三层的、相互矛盾的叙述。
更新日期:2020-04-02
中文翻译:
言简意赅:正发党关于库尔德政治的三层叙事
摘要 2009 年至 2015 年,正义与发展党 (AKP) 提出了几项倡议,以结束库尔德多数地区的叛乱。然而,接连不断的“开工”均未能取得进展。正发党的选举和国际目标逐渐与和平进程不一致,正发党在 2015 年 7 月采取了强硬手段。2009 年至 2015 年的进程起伏表明它已经很脆弱。这种脆弱性的一些原因是 AKP 的外部原因,例如反对党急于利用这一过程来挖走民族主义选民和 PKK 的暴力行为。然而,我认为 AKP 叙述的矛盾性也是一个关键因素。党的早期叙述要求严格分离两层:打击恐怖分子的安全政策和解决公民合法不满的民主化政策。然而,它后来试验的主体间策略需要这两个领域之间的灰色区域。正发党没有改变战略,而是构建了一个三层的、相互矛盾的叙述。