reinterpretation by non-elites. Critically, the book adds a welcome corrective to the scholarship on and of nation-building that omits micro-level interpretation of nation-building. The volume claims to address nontraditional approaches in nation-building in the second part, whereas the first six chapters deal with traditional approaches “in new ways” (p. 11). However, it becomes apparent that, while the last six chapters engage with nontraditional nation-building tools, the first six chapters would have benefitted from a greater engagement with the underlining, innovative ways explored by other authors in post-Soviet nationbuilding. Altogether, however, the volume is a timely encouragement to turn to an alternative view of nation-building and it sets out a definitive research paradigm for the postSoviet region that can clearly inform other aspects of area studies. The book will inspire students and researchers looking for innovative ways of thinking about nation-building and keen on re-thinking the “traditional” idea of nation-building.

中文翻译：

---

冲突与合作中的希腊和土耳其：从欧洲化到去欧洲化

非精英的重新诠释。至关重要的是，这本书对忽略了对国家建设的微观解释的关于国家建设的学术进行了令人欢迎的纠正。该卷声称在第二部分讨论国家建设中的非传统方法，而前六章则以“新方式”处理传统方法（第 11 页）。然而，很明显，虽然最后六章涉及非传统的国家建设工具，但前六章会受益于更多地参与其他作者在后苏联国家建设中探索的重点创新方法。不过总的来说，本书适时地鼓励人们转向另一种国家建设的观点，它为后苏联地区提出了明确的研究范式，可以清楚地为地区研究的其他方面提供信息。这本书将激励学生和研究人员寻找创新的国家建设思维方式，并热衷于重新思考国家建设的“传统”理念。