ABSTRACT The article aims to integrate key concepts from social movement, citizenship and gender theories with afocus on (political) intersectionality at the interface of migration, race, gender and sexuality. It explores the responses from civil society groups to the exclusive intersections of right-wing politics and discourses in Austria and Denmark with afocus on inclusive intersectionality and transversal politics. The article asks if and how the intersectional repertoires of NGOs were able to create transversal politics and joint activities and explains why these NGOs were unable to counter right-wing hegemony. It uses the cases of Austria and Denmark to illustrate the diverse mobilizations of counter-forces against the attempts to forge an anti-migration and anti-Muslim consensus. The focus is on the mobilization of anti-racist and pro-migrant groups, comparing their strategies and inclusionary repertoires including feminist claims, the framing of activist citizenship, acts of citizenship and of solidarity. The article scrutinizes strategies of transversal politics against the exclusionary right in the two countries; shows the influence of the different contexts of civil society mobilization, political cultures, welfare and gender regimes as well as the differences between right-wing forces in the two countries.

中文翻译：

---

移民，种族，性别和性的包容性政治交叉点–奥地利和丹麦的情况

摘要本文旨在整合社会运动，公民身份和性别理论中的关键概念，并着重于在移民，种族，性别和性行为的界面上的（政治）交叉性。它探讨了民间社会团体对右翼政治和奥地利和丹麦话语的独特交集的反应，重点是包容性交融和横向政治。这篇文章询问了非政府组织的交集是否以及如何能够创造横向政治和联合活动，并解释了为什么这些非政府组织无法抵抗右翼霸权。它以奥地利和丹麦的案例为例，说明了为形成反移民和反穆斯林共识而进行的各种反动员动员。重点是动员反种族主义和亲移民团体，比较他们的战略和包容性节目，包括女权主义者的主张，维权公民的构成，公民行为和团结。文章仔细研究了两国针对排他性权利的横向政治策略；展示了动员民间社会，政治文化，福利和性别制度的不同背景以及两国右翼势力之间的差异所产生的影响。