This study aims to prove which qualities, from the British and United States actual press, are more adequate for gender violence issues, comparing news on the same stories. It is evident the influence of mass media on public opinion and, therefore, the responsibility that written press has on gender violence messages, avoiding sensationalism. Psycholinguistic studies have established the relation language-thought, so language used in journalism is crucial. Following the belief that newspapers considered more liberal and independent will lead to a better treatment than traditional ones considered to be more reluctant to change, journals have been selected. Furthermore, different cultures can be as objective and respectful but maybe less committed with the issue, as it may arise from the samples. There have been emerging ethic codes giving guidelines to journalists, including discrimination, and more specific on gender sensitive reporting. Therefore, the objective to improve public opinion information, stepping away from stereotypes and oversimplifications, is substantial, and will undoubtedly result in a better understanding of equality.

中文翻译：

---

英美媒体上的性别暴力新闻

这项研究旨在通过比较相同故事的新闻，来证明英国和美国实际新闻界对性别暴力问题更适合的素质。显然，大众媒体对公众舆论产生了影响，因此，书面媒体对性别暴力信息负有责任，避免了煽情行为。心理语言学研究已经建立了语言思想的关系，因此新闻业使用的语言至关重要。相信与传统的报纸相比，报纸被认为更加自由和独立将带来更好的待遇，而传统报纸被认为更不愿意改变，因此选择了期刊。此外，不同的文化可能既客观又受人尊敬，但对问题的关注程度可能较低，因为它可能来自样本。出现了新的道德规范，为新闻工作者提供了指导方针，包括歧视，并且更加具体地针对性别敏感报道。因此，改善民意信息的目标是实实在在的，摆脱陈规定型观念和过分简化的做法，无疑将使人们更好地理解平等。