ABSTRACT Bishop John Longland’s enthusiasm for apprehending heretics in Oxford and the Chilterns is well known. Evidence elsewhere within Lincoln diocese is sparse and problematic. In July 1528 Henry Burnett was questioned by Longland’s chancellor, John Rayne, about a journey to continental Europe. Geoffrey Dickens, Claire Cross and Peter Marshall all considered Burnett’s case connected to one in York involving a Roberte Robynson. Dickens and Cross concluded both travelled together with four others and all six were lollards open to Lutheran ideas. Marshall, whilst persuaded the six formed one homogeneous group, believed they may have been previously conventionally orthodox and learned their heresy from other English sailors. Both interpretations remain plausible, but this article suggests another possibility: the cases may be unconnected; Burnett, shocked by Lutheranism, simply reported the encounter to his priest who sent him to court; and although Rayne may have suspected heresy evidence available permitted no definitive conclusion.

中文翻译：

---

是抑制“可抑制的虐待者”还是追逐阴影？1528 年 7 月英国反对路德和林肯主教的运动

摘要 约翰·朗兰 (John Longland) 主教在牛津和奇尔特恩 (Chiltern) 对逮捕异教徒的热情是众所周知的。林肯教区其他地方的证据稀少且有问题。1528 年 7 月，亨利·伯内特 (Henry Burnett) 被朗兰的总理约翰·雷恩 (John Rayne) 询问关于前往欧洲大陆的旅程。杰弗里·狄更斯 (Geoffrey Dickens)、克莱尔·克罗斯 (Claire Cross) 和彼得·马歇尔 (Peter Marshall) 都认为伯内特 (Burnett) 的案件与约克 (York) 的一起涉及罗伯特·罗宾逊 (Roberte Robynson) 的案件有关。狄更斯和克罗斯得出结论，他们都与其他四人一起旅行，而且六人都是对路德教思想持开放态度的罗拉德。马歇尔在说服六人组成一个同质团体的同时，相信他们以前可能是传统的正统派，并从其他英国水手那里学到了他们的异端邪说。两种解释都有道理，但本文提出了另一种可能性：案件可能没有关联；伯内特，对路德教感到震惊，只是向他的神父报告了这一遭遇，神父将他送上法庭；尽管雷恩可能怀疑是异端邪说，但无法得出明确的结论。