当前位置: X-MOL 学术Middle East Development Journal › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Judicial review in administrative contracts in Egypt: evidence from administrative court rulings in Government Tenders and Bids Law disputes
Middle East Development Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-03 , DOI: 10.1080/17938120.2018.1520001
Sahar Tohamy Hassanin 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This paper examines the role of administrative court review in disputes related to Egypt’s Government Tenders and Bids Law. It assesses whether government authorities are more likely to receive a favorable ruling, whether they receive a larger fraction of their claims, and whether administration-initiated claims face a shorter dispute resolution time. I use rulings data from 472 cases to construct variables for dispute characteristics and outcomes. Analysis shows that, compared to contractors, government authorities have higher odds of receiving favorable awards of both the main disputed values and composite claims (including interest or compensation). Plaintiff identity, on the other hand, does not affect the odds of being awarded a compensation or interest claim. Moreover, administrative authorities, on average, receive a larger fraction of their claims and the difference increases for composite claims and when plaintiffs demand interest or compensation when filing. With respect to dispute resolution time, contractor-initiated cases are shorter on average and economy-wide variables and administrative court restructuring affect dispute resolution time in contrast to their negligible effect on expected dispute outcome. The analysis further suggests that plaintiffs are partially successful in applying law principles when claiming interest and compensation to improve dispute outcomes. However, bias in favor of administrative authorities remains, which is likely the outcome of a combination of the discretionary room that the law grants administrative authorities and the discretion that courts have in applying Civil Law principles governing compensation and interest awards.

中文翻译:

埃及行政合同中的司法审查:政府招标和投标法争议中行政法院裁决的证据

摘要本文探讨了行政法院复审在与埃及政府招标和投标法有关的纠纷中的作用。它评估了政府当局是否更有可能收到有利的裁决,他们是否会收到更多的索赔,以及政府发起的索赔是否面临着较短的争议解决时间。我使用来自472个案例的裁决数据来构建争议特征和结果的变量。分析表明,与承包商相比,政府当局获得主要有争议价值和综合索赔(包括利息或赔偿)的有利裁决的可能性更高。另一方面,原告身份不影响获得赔偿或利息索赔的几率。而且,行政机关平均而言,收到的索赔额较大,复合索赔和原告在提出索赔时要求利息或赔偿时,差额增加。关于争端解决时间,由承包商发起的案件平均较短,经济范围内的变量和行政法院改组影响争端解决时间,而对预期争端结果的影响却微不足道。分析还表明,原告在主张利息和赔偿以改善争端结果时,在适用法律原则方面取得了部分成功。但是,仍然偏向于行政当局,
更新日期:2018-07-03
down
wechat
bug