Abstract This article contends that the central principle of modern philosophy is obscured by a side-debate between two opposed camps that are united in accepting a deeper flawed premise. Consider the powerful critiques of Kantian philosophy offered by Quentin Meillassoux and Bruno Latour, respectively. These two thinkers criticize Kant for opposite reasons: Meillassoux because Kant collapses thought and world into a permanent “correlate” without isolated terms, and Latour because Kant tries to purify thought and world from each other rather than realizing that they are always combined in “hybrid” form. What both critiques tacitly accept is the notion that “thought” and “world” are the two major poles of the universe. I claim that this stems from the post-Cartesian assumption that thought and world are the two basic kinds of things that exist. The name “onto-taxonomy” is introduced for this view.

中文翻译：

---

现代哲学的唯一出路

摘要本文认为，现代哲学的中心原理被两个对立的阵营之间的一次辩论所掩盖，这两个阵营团结一致地接受了一个更深层次的缺陷前提。考虑一下分别由昆汀·梅亚拉索克斯和布鲁诺·拉图尔提出的对康德哲学的强有力的批判。这两个思想家批评康德的原因相反：Meillassoux是因为康德将思想和世界分解成一个永久的“关联”而没有孤立的术语，而拉图尔则是因为康德试图彼此净化思想和世界，而不是意识到它们总是在“杂种”中结合在一起。 ”表格。两种批评都默认接受“思想”和“世界”是宇宙的两个主要两极的观念。我声称这源于后笛卡尔的假设，即思想和世界是存在的两种基本事物。