Abstract In this study, I juxtapose the views of Edna Ullmann-Margalit and Menachem Fisch on radical changes of mind. I note in particular the common aspects of their proposal that typically, radical change is not, indeed, cannot be justified by reasons. Their responses to and arguments for this threat to rationality are critically examined. Hili Razinsky’s analysis of ambivalence is shown to contribute to the understanding of change by providing a broader perspective on the rationality of belief. Her work thus provides a promising alternative to the above positions and the impasse they confront.

中文翻译：

---

改变主意：理性的极限？

摘要在本研究中，我将埃德娜·乌尔曼·马格利特（Edna Ullmann-Margalit）和梅纳赫姆·费施（Menachem Fisch）的观点从根本性的思想变化中并列。我特别注意到他们的提案的共同方面，即通常而言，根本无法通过理由来证明根本改变是合理的。他们对这种合理性威胁的反应和论点进行了严格审查。Hili Razinsky对矛盾心理的分析通过对信念的合理性提供了更广阔的视野，从而有助于对变化的理解。因此，她的工作为上述职位及其所面临的僵局提供了一个有希望的选择。