当前位置: X-MOL 学术Open Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Fetish-Oriented Ontology
Open Philosophy Pub Date : 2020-07-18 , DOI: 10.1515/opphil-2020-0101
Sean Braune 1
Affiliation  

Abstract In her essay, “After de Brosses” (2017), Rosalind C. Morris briefly considers the historical importance of the concept of the fetish on the relatively recent movements of new materialism, but she does not engage with Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology. This essay addresses this gap and focuses on the influence of the fetish on Speculative Realism and Object-Oriented Ontology by focusing on Graham Harman’s conception of objects and Quentin Meillassoux’s theory of arche-fossils. In short, I am offering a posthumanist theorization of the fetish in order to argue that Object-Oriented Ontology can be considered, at points, to be a fetish-oriented ontology and that this notion of the fetish allows us to think about philosophical considerations of objects in a new light.

中文翻译:

恋物癖本体论

摘要罗莎琳德·C·莫里斯(Rosalind C.Morris)在其论文《 After de Brosses》(2017年)中简要考虑了恋物癖概念在相对较新的新近主义运动中的历史重要性,但她并未参与投机现实主义和面向对象本体论。本文通过关注格雷厄姆·哈曼(Graham Harman)的物体概念和昆汀·梅拉索克斯(Quentin Meil​​lassoux)的化石理论,着重研究了恋物癖对投机现实主义和面向对象本体论的影响。简而言之,我提供了一种恋物癖的后人文主义理论,以便论证在某些情况下可以将面向对象的本体论视为一种恋物癖的本体论,并且这种恋物癖的概念使我们可以考虑以下方面的哲学考虑:新的对象。
更新日期:2020-07-18
down
wechat
bug