当前位置: X-MOL 学术New Writing › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Forking-path routines for plot advancement and problem solving in narrative composition and dramatic writing
New Writing Pub Date : 2019-12-02 , DOI: 10.1080/14790726.2019.1694952
George Varotsis 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This paper investigates how plot-advancement routines, i.e. ‘what-if’, ‘if-do’, and forking-path story alternatives, are generated in narrative composition and dramatic writing by exploring cognitive representations such as schemata and problem-solving mechanisms. The complexity of narrative synthesis and problem-solving involves the integration, organisation and recall of data relations in a systemic way through identification of logical inconsistencies. Cognitively, the advancement of plot is not based solely on the consolidation of narrative information. Authors have to base their strategic decisions also on architectural and structural, goal-oriented routines and sub-routines, all of which are investigated in this paper through a comparative analysis of topics from behavioural and cognitive psychology, cognitive narratology and narrative theory, artificial intelligence and narrative causality, aiming to elucidate a multifaceted process during dramatic writing and narrative composition.

中文翻译:

在叙事写作和戏剧写作中推进情节和解决问题的分叉路径例程

摘要 本文通过探索认知表征(例如图式和问题解决机制)来研究情节推进例程,即“假设”、“如果-做”和分叉路径故事替代方案是如何在叙事写作和戏剧写作中产生的。 . 叙事合成和问题解决的复杂性涉及通过识别逻辑不一致以系统的方式整合、组织和回忆数据关系。在认知上,情节的推进并不仅仅基于叙事信息的整合。作者的战略决策还必须基于架构和结构、面向目标的例程和子例程,本文通过对行为和认知心理学主题的比较分析来研究所有这些,
更新日期:2019-12-02
down
wechat
bug