Rarely has an official Australian report been so keenly awaited across regulatory, practitioner and academic circles. Just what would the shrink in the boardroom make of contemporary practice? What stunning insights could an organisational psychologist bring to the table, albeit incorporated into a framework that comprised the usual suspects? The answer is not much but not for the reasons that have prompted such apocalyptic resentment from the big end of town. The staging for maximum impact could not be faulted. More than 2500 members and associates of the Australian Institute for Company Directors had gathered at the Sydney International Convention Centre. The chair of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, James Shipton, had turned down an invitation to help shape global discourse at the OECD’s Trust in Business forum in Paris to impart the findings of a year-long investigation into the risk management practices of Australian Stock exchange listed corporations, with particular reference to the identification by boards of directors of non-financial indicators. The content and tone of the speech was accusatory if somewhat pleading.

中文翻译：

---

会议室里的人：无知的病态

监管界、从业者和学术界对澳大利亚官方报告如此期待的情况很少见。会议室里的萎缩会对当代实践产生什么影响？组织心理学家可以带来哪些惊人的见解，尽管纳入了一个由通常的嫌疑人组成的框架？答案并不多，但并不是因为引起了城镇大端的这种世界末日般的怨恨。最大影响的阶段不能出错。超过 2500 名澳大利亚公司董事协会的会员和协会会员聚集在悉尼国际会议中心。澳大利亚证券和投资委员会主席 James Shipton，拒绝了在巴黎经合组织的商业信托论坛上帮助塑造全球话语的邀请，以传播对澳大利亚证券交易所上市公司风险管理实践的为期一年的调查结果，特别是参考董事会确定的非财务指标董事。演讲的内容和语气虽然有些恳求，却是指责。