Abstract The common belief in the absolute justifiability and universal validity of human rights still confronts its own powerlessness today in the face of worldwide humanitarian catastrophes. Despite all of the recurring statements about the global protection of their human rights, the voices of the people affected remain unheard, and their legal position resembles a state of rights-deprivation and “bare life”. The legitimacy of these human living beings not yet protected by law cannot be established by the anthropocentric rhetoric of human rights ideologues. Instead, it requires the inclusion of associations of humans and things, of non-human living beings, and even of future generations. This is precisely where the chances of a re-humanization of the law lie, based on a posthuman “right to rights.”

中文翻译：

---

为什么非人权？

摘要 人权的绝对正当性和普遍有效性的共同信念在今天面对世界范围的人道主义灾难时仍然面临着自身的无力感。尽管所有关于全球保护其人权的声明一再出现，受影响者的声音仍然无人倾听，他们的法律地位类似于一种权利剥夺和“赤裸裸的生活”状态。这些尚未受到法律保护的人类生物的合法性无法通过人权理论家的以人类为中心的言论来确立。相反，它需要包含人与物、非人类生物，甚至后代的关联。这正是基于后人类“权利”的法律重新人性化的机会所在。