ABSTRACT This article re-examines epistolary accounts by Berenguela and Blanche of Castile of the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa. Building on previous assertions that Berenguela’s letter is a forgery, and through close comparison with the three surviving male eyewitness battle accounts, this article argues the letters of Berenguela and Blanche – in the form in which they survive – are confections based on original letters. The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa’s mythical status and standing as a watershed event within the narrative of Gran Reconquista is understood to have been largely shaped by three male-authored chronicle accounts: Chronica Latina regum Castelle (1239), Chronicon mundi (1239) and De rebus Hispaniae (1243). In asserting these letters are confected accounts, in circulation by the 1220s, this article argues that battle commemoration began in the immediate aftermath of the Christian victory, and that female voices were recognised by contemporaries as a viable tool for commemoration.

中文翻译：

---

重新思考战斗纪念活动：女性信件和拉斯·纳瓦斯·德·托洛萨（Las Navas de Tolosa）战斗的神话（1212）

摘要本文重新审视了拉斯·纳瓦斯·德·托洛萨战役的卡斯蒂利亚的贝伦古拉和布兰奇的书信。在先前断言贝伦盖拉的信是伪造品的基础上，并通过与三个幸存的男性目击者战斗记录进行仔细比较，本文认为贝伦盖拉和布兰奇的字母（以它们生存的形式）是基于原始字母的甜点。拉斯·纳瓦斯·德·托洛萨战役的神话地位和地位在Gran Reconquista叙事中是一个分水岭，据了解，这场战役很大程度上是由三个男性撰写的编年史帐户塑造的：Chronica Latina regum Castelle（1239），Chronicon mundi（1239）和德·史密斯（1243）。断言这些信件是由1220年代散发的已建立的帐户，