ABSTRACT The internet has revolutionised our ability to communicate and connect across historic social, political and geographic divides. Where previously gatekeepers mitigated and negotiated access to mass media platforms, today potentially anyone – and any content – can reach millions of users in an instant. This development bears great opportunities for the democratisation of expression and the diversification of public discourse but has likewise broadened the impact of harm caused online. This raises the question how platforms and services can be regulated effectively to combat online harms without jeopardising free and open discourse. The paper explores the Online Harms White Paper published by the UK Government earlier this year and compares its regulatory approach with the infamous German Network Enforcement Law.

中文翻译：

---

在线危害白皮书：比较英国和德国的监管方法

摘要互联网彻底改变了我们跨越历史上的社会，政治和地理鸿沟进行沟通和连接的能力。在以前的看门人减轻和协商对大众媒体平台的访问的地方，今天，任何人-以及任何内容-都可以立即到达数百万用户。这种发展为表达民主化和公共话语多样化带来了巨大的机遇，但同样也扩大了在线伤害的影响。这就提出了一个问题，即如何有效地监管平台和服务以应对在线危害，而又不损害自由开放的言论。本文探讨了今年初英国政府发布的《在线危害白皮书》，并将其监管方法与臭名昭著的《德国网络实施法》进行了比较。