ABSTRACT This article analyses the latest judgment of the European Court of Human Rights dealing with the right of reply. The court held that the compulsion for a publisher to print a reply to an editorial he had written and published in his newspaper did not violate his fundamental rights. Exploring the key findings, this analysis sets out the decision’s wider implications for freedom of expression, the right to a fair trial, and the right to private life. Particularly, the case comes to significant conclusions that might result in the widening of the admissible content of a reply and an extension of the scope of the remedy. By reinterpreting the normative foundations of the right of reply, it also combines disparate approaches from previous case law. Thus, this article highlights both the ruling’s practical implications and potential repercussions for future application of domestic and international law on the right of reply.

中文翻译：

---

《欧洲人权公约》的答辩权：对Eker v Turkey App No 24016/05的分析（欧洲人权法院，2017年10月24日）

摘要本文分析了欧洲人权法院关于答辩权的最新判决。法院认为，强迫出版商对他在报纸上撰写并发表的社论发表答复的行为并不侵犯他的基本权利。在分析关键发现之后，该分析阐明了该决定对表达自由，公正审判权和私人生活权的广泛影响。特别是，此案得出了重要结论，可能导致答复的可受理内容扩大和补救范围扩大。通过重新解释答辩权的规范基础，它还结合了先前判例法的不同方法。从而，