ABSTRACT Photographs published in the Mail Online of Musician Paul Weller and his young children taken in the street in California were subject to a misuse of private information and breach of Data Protection Act claim against Associated Newspapers Limited. In the Court of Appeal's judgment a number of matters were given consideration, including the application of Californian law, where it was lawful to both take and publish the photographs; whether the claimants had a reasonable expectation of privacy; the relevance of the status of the child and the extent to which matters such as consent play a role. In outlining these issues the case emphasises a need for more clarity on both the taking and publishing of photographs – in relation to the famous and their children, and to children in general.

中文翻译：

---

Weller＆Ors v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1176.Wellercase着重说明了有关摄影，隐私和新闻界的指导

摘要音乐家保罗·威尔勒（Paul Weller）和他的年幼孩子在加利福尼亚街头流浪的《邮件在线》上发布的照片​​均被滥用私人信息，并且违反了《数据保护法》对联合报业有限公司的要求。上诉法院的判决考虑了许多事项，包括加利福尼亚法律的适用，在该法律下，拍摄和出版照片均属合法；申索人是否有合理的私隐期望；儿童地位的相关性以及同意等事项的影响程度。在概述这些问题时，本案强调需要更加清晰地拍摄和发布照片-与名人及其子女以及一般儿童有关。