Abstract The aim of this paper is to explain why and how to bridge the distance between environmental planning and practices of commoning. Though commoning has become a cornerstone of environmental planning theories, there are shortcomings in its link with actual practices. Inversely, though the practice of commoning faces social and environmental challenges at a large scale, links with environmental panning theories are underdeveloped. One of the reasons for these missing links is a difference in approach to space and its representation in design. Planning theories are based on ‘strategical’ plans, while practices of commoning rather use ‘tactical’ images. This paper argues why and how planning theories and the practice of commoning should be linked, by analyzing the transformation of the terrils (spoil tips) of Charleroi, Belgium. Design research into this landscape illustrates how combining ‘strategical’ and ‘tactical’ design tools may help overcome current shortages.

中文翻译：

---

共同规划：对沙勒罗瓦的 terrils 进行设计研究

摘要 本文的目的是解释为什么以及如何弥合环境规划与公共实践之间的距离。共性虽然已成为环境规划理论的基石，但在与实际的联系上仍存在不足。相反，尽管公用实践面临大规模的社会和环境挑战，但与环境平移理论的联系并不发达。这些缺失环节的原因之一是空间方法及其在设计中的表现方式不同。规划理论基于“战略”计划，而共同实践则使用“战术”图像。本文通过分析比利时沙勒罗瓦的 terrils（破坏提示）的转变，论证了为什么以及如何将规划理论与公用实践联系起来。