ABSTRACT

This article aims to cut through the organizational mess that characterizes interventionist practices. It combines the concept of bureaucratic field with Multiple Correspondence Analysis to bring out the structures that underpin interventions. This quali-quantitative method can therefore break new ground in charting the social structures to which statebuilding gives birth, as the case study on bordering interventions in Central Asia illustrates. In this region, international bureaucrats work across borders in order to change how borders work. The experts of the European Commission and the OSCE wield more power than those of the IOM and the UNODC in turning the interstate borders of Central Asian States into filters that decelerate threats and accelerate wealth.

摘要

本文旨在消除表征干预主义实践的组织混乱。它将官僚领域的概念与多重对应分析相结合，从而形成了支持干预的结构。因此，这种定性定量的方法可以在制图国家建设产生的社会结构方面开辟新的领域，如中亚接壤干预措施的案例研究所示。在这个地区，国际官僚跨界工作，以改变边界的工作方式。欧洲委员会和欧安组织的专家在将中亚国家的州际边界变成减轻威胁和加速财富的过滤器方面，比国际移徙组织和毒品和犯罪问题办公室的权力更大。