The discrepancies in Indonesia’s diplomatic approach on the death penalty for its people abroad and other nationalities at home have raised ‘double standard’ concerns. By looking into the factors affecting Indonesia’s diplomatic approach to Australia using the case of Bali Nine, the study explored the rationale of the Indonesian government putting national interest over its human rights commitment despite the increased pressure on its death penalty practice in the debate between human rights and state sovereignty. This study used the interview method with two objectives. First, to investigate the factors influencing Indonesia’s diplomatic approach to the Bali Nine case, and second, to explore the conflict between human rights and state sovereignty by drawing upon the theoretical framework on human rights and foreign policy as proposed by Jack Donnelly. The finding of this paper suggests that human rights interests are subordinated to other national interests in balancing the objectives of Indonesia’s diplomacy on the drug-related death penalty practice.

中文翻译：

---

人权，国家主权和死刑：印度尼西亚对巴厘岛九岛的外交方针

印度尼西亚对外国人和本国其他人的死刑采取外交手段上的差异引起了“双重标准”的关注。通过使用巴厘岛九案调查影响印尼对澳大利亚的外交方式的因素，该研究探索了印尼政府在其人权承诺上将国家利益置于其人权承诺上的理由，尽管在人权之间的辩论中死刑实践的压力越来越大和国家主权。这项研究使用了具有两个目标的访谈方法。首先，调查影响印尼对巴厘九号案采取外交方式的因素，其次，借鉴杰克·唐纳利（Jack Donnelly）提出的有关人权与外交政策的理论框架，探讨人权与国家主权之间的冲突。本文的发现表明，在平衡印度尼西亚有关毒品死刑实践的外交目标方面，人权利益从属于其他国家利益。