当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Education Culture and Society › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Correlation between Level of Personal Well-being and Spirituality
Journal of Education Culture and Society Pub Date : 2020-09-11 , DOI: 10.15503/jecs2020.2.267.280
Tetiana Danylchenko

Aim: The aim of this paper is to define the correlation between experiencing personal well-being and manifestations of spirituality of an individual. Methods: The study involved the citizens of Chernihiv (average age – 33.2 years old): 96 people in total, 40 men and 56 women. The following methods were used: a) to measure the components of personal well-being – Satisfaction with Life scale by E. Diener, Psychological well-being scale by С. Riff, Questionnaire of parameters of subjective social well-being by T. Danylchenko; b) to measure the spiritual component – EPU Plus (Egoism - Personal Uniqueness) by L. Z. Levit, Methodology of measuring social interaction (mentality aspect) by G. L. Voronin. Results: The source of experiencing personal well-being is positive health (physical abilities, absence of physical limitations). Factors that decrease personal well-being are low level of tolerance and the pursuit of pleasure. Personal well-being is ensured by belief about collaboration and experiencing positive health as a state of readiness for activity. Psychological well-being has a negative correlation with basic egoism (the pursuit of pleasure) and a positive one with social egoism (ability to comply one’s needs with the group interests, following social rules and norms). Subjective social well-being relates to the highest egoism (unique self-realization, realization of existing potential in an acceptable way). The orientation towards achieving personal or public goals determines the peculiarities of experiencing well-being in the eudaemonic and hedonistic dimensions.

中文翻译:

个人幸福感与精神状态的相关性

目的:本文的目的是定义经历个人福祉与个人灵性表现之间的相关性。方法:该研究涉及切尔尼戈夫(平均年龄– 33.2岁)的公民:总共96人,其中40名男性和56名女性。使用以下方法:a)衡量个人幸福感的组成部分– E. Diener的人生满意度量表,С的心理健康量表。里夫,T。Danylchenko主观社会幸福感参数问卷;b)衡量精神成分– L. Z. Levit撰写的EPU Plus(利己主义-个人独特性),G。L. Voronin撰写的衡量社会互动(心理方面)的方法论。结果:经历个人福祉的来源是积极的健康(身体能力,没有身体限制)。降低个人幸福感的因素是低水平的宽容和追求愉悦感。对合作的信念和积极健康的精神保证了个人的幸福感,这是他们准备活动的一种状态。心理幸福与基本利己主义(追求乐趣)负相关,与社会利己主义(与社会规则和规范相符的能力,符合群体利益的能力)正相关。主观的社会福祉与最高的利己主义有关(独特的自我实现,以可接受的方式实现现有潜力)。实现个人或公共目标的方向决定了在婚姻和享乐主义维度上体验幸福的特殊性。对合作的信念和积极健康的精神保证了个人的幸福感,这是他们准备活动的一种状态。心理幸福与基本利己主义(追求快乐)负相关,而与社会利己主义(与社会规则和规范相符的能力,使其满足团体利益的能力)成正相关。主观的社会福祉与最高的利己主义有关(独特的自我实现,以可接受的方式实现现有潜力)。实现个人或公共目标的方向决定了在婚姻和享乐主义维度上体验幸福的特殊性。对合作的信念和积极健康的精神保证了个人的幸福感,这是他们准备活动的一种状态。心理幸福与基本利己主义(追求快乐)负相关,而与社会利己主义(与社会规则和规范相符的能力,使其满足团体利益的能力)成正相关。主观的社会福祉与最高的利己主义有关(独特的自我实现,以可接受的方式实现现有潜力)。实现个人或公共目标的方向决定了在婚姻和享乐主义维度上体验幸福的特殊性。心理幸福与基本利己主义(追求快乐)负相关,而与社会利己主义(与社会规则和规范相符的能力,使其满足团体利益的能力)成正相关。主观的社会福祉与最高的利己主义有关(独特的自我实现,以可接受的方式实现现有潜力)。实现个人或公共目标的方向决定了在婚姻和享乐主义维度上体验幸福的特殊性。心理幸福与基本利己主义(追求快乐)负相关,而与社会利己主义(与社会规则和规范相符的能力,使其满足团体利益的能力)成正相关。主观的社会福祉与最高的利己主义有关(独特的自我实现,以可接受的方式实现现有潜力)。实现个人或公共目标的方向决定了在婚姻和享乐主义维度上体验幸福的特殊性。
更新日期:2020-09-11
down
wechat
bug