This research aimed to analyze the types of maxims of the cooperative principle that were used and also violated in the 2019 Indonesian presidential debate. A descriptive method was applied to examine the research questions. The data of this study were the conversations that fulfilled and violated the cooperative principle based on four maxims of cooperative principles: Maxim of quantity, maxim of relation, maxim of manner, and maxim of quality. The results of this qualitative study revealed that the two maxims violated by the candidates in the 2019 Indonesian presidential debates were the maxim of relevance and maxim of manner. The maxim of manner was the mostly violated maxim by the candidates. The candidates not only violated but also fulfilled the maxims of the cooperative principle. They fulfilled the maxim of relevance, maxim of manner, and maxim of quality. Furthermore, the maxim of quality was the maxim that was mostly fulfilled by the candidates in the 2019 Indonesian Presidential Debates.

中文翻译：

---

2019年印度尼西亚总统辩论中的合作原则：格莱斯的格言分析

这项研究旨在分析在2019年印度尼西亚总统辩论中使用和违反的合作原则的格言类型。描述性方法被应用于研究问题。本研究的数据是基于合作原则的四个准则，即满足和违反合作原则的对话：数量准则，关系准则，方式准则和质量准则。这项定性研究的结果显示，候选人在2019年印度尼西亚总统辩论中违反的两个格言是相关性格言和态度格言。态度准则是候选人最违反的准则。候选人不仅违反了合作原则，而且履行了合作原则。他们实现了相关性准则，方式准则，和质量的最大化。此外，质量准则是候选人在2019年印尼总统辩论中基本实现的准则。