The purpose of this study is to develop a scale to determine Primary Education and Turkish Language teachers' perceptions regarding the frequency of spelling mistakes which their students make. Therefore, this experimental form made to serve this goal was presented to field specialists in terms of consultation; and each item in the form was regulated to ensure content validity rates in accordance with the feedback provided by the specialists. Items with the validity rate below 0.80 were omitted from the form. The trial form consisting of 34 items was administered to 232 Primary Education and Turkish Language teachers who teach at schools under the jurisdiction of Ministry of National Education (MoNE) via e-mail, and the gathered data were analyzed. With the help of Exploratory Factor Analyses (EFA), a four-dimensioned construct with 19 items including frequently made mistakes regarding acronyms, spelling of conjunctions and suffixes, spelling of capital letters, spelling of compound words, and the spelling of the words affected by word formation processes. In the analyses, the relations between the sub-scales of the original scale were taken into consideration, revealing that factors had positive and significant relationships and sub-dimensions were the constituents of the general structure named spelling mistakes, which made up the upper structure. Goodness of fit indices (GFI) of the model was detected to be quite high. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) administered to the second research group justified the EFA results. The internal consistency coefficient, calculated as .91, for the entire scale was found to be quite reliable.

中文翻译：

---

教师对拼写规则认知能力发展量表的研究

这项研究的目的是建立一个量表，以确定小学教育和土耳其语教师对学生犯拼写错误的频率的看法。因此，为实现这一目标而制作的这种实验形式已通过咨询的方式提供给了现场专家。并且根据专家提供的反馈对表格中的每个项目进行了规范，以确保内容的有效性。表格中省略了有效率低于0.80的项目。通过电子邮件向在国家教育部（MoNE）管辖下的学校任教的232名小学和土耳其语教师提供了由34个项目组成的试用表，并对收集的数据进行了分析。在探索性因素分析（EFA）的帮助下，一个包含19个项目的4维结构，包括首字母缩写词，连词和后缀的拼写，大写字母的拼写，复合词的拼写以及受构词过程影响的单词的拼写错误。在分析中，考虑了原始量表的子量表之间的关系，揭示了因素之间存在正向和显着的关系，子量纲是称为拼写错误的一般结构的组成部分，构成了上部结构。检测到模型的拟合度指标（GFI）很高。对第二个研究小组进行的验证性因素分析（CFA）证明了EFA结果的合理性。发现整个量表的内部一致性系数为0.91，非常可靠。