Immigration and free movement of persons has become one of the main questions on the agenda of security institutions all over Europe. These aspects are now taken into consideration when drafting national security conceptions and prevention plans. Experts are defining threats that arise specifically from this phenomena – free movement of persons. Together with this, another problem is outlining – is the current instruments to limit free movement for the cause of national security enough to prevent certain security risks? In this paper author is researching the threats to national security caused by the free movement of persons and views the possibilities to limit these threats. The task of the research is to determine whether today we should understand free movement as it was understood previously and what are the current consequences of this phenomena, what new threats to national security it has caused and what could be done to eliminate these threats. In the preparation of the paper author uses number of scientific research methods. Author applies analytical method by analysing available literature, laws and other legal documents. Comparative method is used to compare different legal and practical studies. Statistical method is used when gathering statistical data, performing surveys and expert interviews. The results of the research show that existing instruments available to limit free movement of persons for the sake of national security are not enough to prevent complex threats. Europe’s expectations that immigration and free movement of persons are one of the core instrument to warm the economy have not been met. Thus Europe is flooded by immigrants that are subjects of threat to national security. H ostile third countries are using existing situation for their advantage and challenge Europe’s core values. Current situation in the migration field, refugee crisis, lingering to solve immigration problems and create effective instruments to manage the immigration flows are the aspects that should be considered as a favour to hostile countries. Solution in this situation could be rising capacities and intensifying counterespionage. Widening the view on conventional migration issues and strengthening the cooperation could be more appropriate to manage identified threats. Another way to manage alternating situation is to create new instruments to limit free movement of persons for the sake of national security and adjusting or creating common legal basis. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.10.14633

中文翻译：

---

人员的自由流动是防止威胁国家安全的问题的原因

人员的移民和自由流动已经成为整个欧洲安全机构议程上的主要问题之一。现在在起草国家安全构想和预防计划时考虑到这些方面。专家们正在定义特别是由这种现象引起的威胁-人员的自由活动。与此同时，另一个问题是概述–当前限制国家安全的自由行动的文书是否足以防止某些安全风险？本文作者正在研究人员自由流动对国家安全的威胁，并探讨了限制这些威胁的可能性。研究的任务是确定今天我们是否应该像以前所理解的那样了解自由流动，这种现象的当前后果是什么，它对国家安全造成了什么新的威胁，以及如何消除这些威胁。在编写本文时，作者使用了许多科学研究方法。作者通过分析可用的文献，法律和其他法律文件来应用分析方法。比较法用于比较不同的法律和实践研究。收集统计数据，进行调查和专家访谈时使用统计方法。研究结果表明，为了国家安全，现有的限制人员自由流动的手段不足以防止复杂的威胁。欧洲对移民和人员自由流动是温暖经济的核心手段之一的期望没有实现。因此，欧洲充满了对国家安全构成威胁的移民。第三世界大国正利用现有形势来发挥自己的优势，并挑战欧洲的核心价值观。移徙领域的现状，难民危机，徘徊不去解决移民问题和创造有效的手段来管理移民潮是应视为有利于敌对国家的方面。解决这种情况的办法可能是提高能力并加大反间谍活动。扩大对传统移徙问题的看法并加强合作可能更适合于应对已查明的威胁。处理交替局势的另一种方法是，为了国家安全，制定新的文书以限制人员的自由流动，并调整或建立共同的法律基础。DOI：http：//dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.0.10.14633