In this paper I seek to critically examine UCT’s and CCT’s and consider how a Levinasian ethics might offer normative guidelines to evaluate such aid programmes. Such an analysis will serve to both critique and supplement the traditional utilitarian analyses of such programmes. In so doing, this paper also hopes to contribute to the business ethics literature in which a Levinasian ethics may be brought to bear on real world problems. I proceed by enlisting Jordaan (2009) who argues that a Levinasian ethical politics can be instantiated in institutional designs by allowing a more complex representation of the other’s alterity. Two UCT programmes are interrogated in light of this finding – the first, a UCT programme in a community in Vietnam; the second, a joint CCT/UCT programme targeting adolescent girls in Malawi, designed to test the efficacy of conditionality to achieve certain.

中文翻译：

---

他们可以选择：援助，列维纳斯和无条件现金转移

在本文中，我试图批判性地考察UCT和CCT，并考虑列维纳斯伦理学如何提供评估此类援助计划的规范性指南。这种分析将有助于批评和补充对此类方案的传统功利主义分析。通过这样做，本文还希望为商业道德文献做出贡献，在其中可以将列维纳斯伦理学带入现实世界问题。首先，我请约尔丹（Jordaan，2009年）提出，他认为，可以通过对他人变更的更复杂的表述来在机构设计中实例化列维纳斯伦理政治。根据这一发现，有两个UCT计划受到了质疑–第一个是在越南社区中的UCT计划；第二个是针对马拉维的少女的CCT / UCT联合计划，