当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reconstructing Bergson’s Critique of Intensive Magnitude
Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology Pub Date : 2020-08-18 , DOI: 10.1080/00071773.2020.1806688
John R. Bagby 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

In “Bergson and Intensive Magnitude: Dismantling his Critique”, Florian Vermeiren argues that Bergson’s critique of intensive magnitude in Time and Free Will is inconsistent with his later philosophy, and even inconsistent with the role of a “difference in degrees of freedom” in Time and Free Will. I argue that it is rather Vermeiren’s analysis which mischaracterizes Bergson’s critique and therefore the interpretation of an inconsistency cannot stand. In the first two sections I reevaluate Bergson’s critique, showing what, according to Bergson, are the good and bad senses of intensity, and how this critique allowed Bergson to institute a new conception of difference as expressed in concrete continuity. In the final section I examine the importance of infinitesimal thought in Bergson’s good sense of intensity.



中文翻译:

重建伯格森对强度幅度的批判

摘要

弗洛里安·维尔梅伦(Florian Vermeiren)在“伯格森和强烈的修辞:消除批判”一书中指出,伯格森对时间和自由意志的强烈批判与他后来的哲学观点不一致,甚至与时间上“自由度差异”的作用不一致。和自由意志。我认为,Vermeiren的分析误导了Bergson的批评,因此对不一致的解释无法成立。在前两节中,我重新评估了柏格森的批判,展示了根据柏格森所说的强度感的好坏,以及这种批判如何使柏格森树立了具体连续性所表达的新的差异概念。在最后一节中,我将探讨无限小思想对Bergson良好的强度意识的重要性。

更新日期:2020-08-18
down
wechat
bug