ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with the turning that occurs within the work of Martin Heidegger. In particular it seeks to reveal it as a turning that takes place within the notion of history as it is elaborated by Heidegger in the difference between Nietzsche and Hölderlin, that is, in the difference between philosophy and poetizing. It locates the necessity for such a turning in Heidegger's dissatisfaction with his own thinking up to the early 1930s (as suggested in his Black Notebooks). In particular the paper focuses on Heidegger's confrontation with Nietzsche over the question of nihilism in the hope of drawing out the different approaches of each thinker in trying to think this problem historically, and how this confrontation helps move Heidegger's thought towards a more poietical way of thinking. The paper concludes that Heidegger, in seeking to distinguish his thought from that of Nietzsche's, not only owes a debt to Nietzsche but that Heidegger's non-public texts of the late 1930s and early 1940s are also formally indebted to him.

中文翻译：

---

历史思考的必要性–尼采之后的海德格尔

摘要本文涉及马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）工作中发生的转变。特别是，它试图将其揭示为一种在历史观念内发生的转折，正如海德格尔在尼采和荷尔德林之间的差异，即哲学与诗歌化之间的差异所阐述的那样。它为海德格尔对自己直到1930年代初的思想的不满（如他的《黑色笔记本》中所建议的）做出了转变。本文特别关注海德格尔与尼采在虚无主义问题上的对抗，以期找出每个思想家尝试历史性思考这一问题的不同方法，以及这种对抗如何帮助海德格尔的思想朝着更诗意的思维方式发展。 。