当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Private International Law › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Concurrent liabilities and jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment under the Brussels Ia Regulation
Journal of Private International Law Pub Date : 2020-05-03 , DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2020.1762978
Michiel Poesen

This article sets out to map the different tests, and their corresponding theoretical foundations, used for determining whether the employment section of the Brussels Ia Regulation applies to concurrent liabilities. Thereby it will explicate the often unspoken theories that inform seemingly straightforward approaches to characterisation on which the applicability of the employment section to concurrent liabilities hinges. It argues that the preferable way forward is the “material link test”, under which the employment section should apply insofar as the facts underlying a claim have a material link to an employment relationship in terms of time, place, means or purpose. Other solutions, which are centred on the indispensability of interpreting the employment contract or the nature of a claim’s legal basis, are to be disregarded as ineffective and overly complex.

中文翻译:

《布鲁塞尔Ia条例》规定的兼职责任和对个人雇用合同的管辖权

本文着手绘制不同的测试及其相应的理论基础,以用于确定《布鲁塞尔Ia法规》的雇佣部分是否适用于并发负债。因此,它将阐明经常不言而喻的理论,这些理论为看似简单的表征方法提供了依据,而就业部分对并发负债的适用性取决于这些方法。它认为,更可取的前进方式是“实质联系检验”,在此基础上,就索赔而言所依据的事实在时间,地点,方式或目的方面与雇佣关系具有实质联系的情况下,应适用就业部分。其他解决方案的重点在于解释劳动合同或要求的法律依据的性质,
更新日期:2020-05-03
down
wechat
bug