当前位置: X-MOL 学术Geophysics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Estimating the nuclear magnetic resonance surface relaxivity of Eocene sandstones: A comparison of different approaches
Geophysics ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2021-02-05 , DOI: 10.1190/geo2020-0501.1
Zeyu Zhang 1 , Andreas Weller 1
Affiliation  

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) relaxometry typically involves the analysis of a relaxation time distribution. The surface relaxivity (ρ) is the key parameter that relates the relaxation time to the pore radius. Only a good estimate of the surface relaxivity enables a reliable determination of the pore radius distribution in a rock or sediment sample. A wide variety of approaches for the estimation of ρ has been proposed; however, the accuracy of ρ determination approaches has rarely been checked. We have compared different approaches of ρ determination for a set of Eocene sandstone samples. Most approaches based on a weighted logarithmic mean of relaxation times or the peak relaxation time result in significant underestimation of ρ. However, the correct weighting of the set of relaxation times has proven to be a crucial approach in ρ determination. The consequent application of geometric rules suggests the application of the weighted harmonic mean (Thm). The specific surface area per unit pore volume (Spor), which results from the gas adsorption method, is another crucial parameter in most approaches for ρ estimation. The quantities Thm and Spor depend on the resolution of the used method. Applying the fractal theory, we adopt an approach that performs an upscaling of Spor to the resolution of the NMR relaxometry. Using equal resolution for Thm and Spor, we obtain more reliable ρ estimates. The resulting ρ values are comparable with the ones determined by using the median relaxation time from NMR and the median pore-throat radius from the mercury injection capillary pressure method.

中文翻译:

估算始新世砂岩的核磁共振表面弛豫度:不同方法的比较

核磁共振(NMR)弛豫法通常涉及弛豫时间分布的分析。表面松弛度ρ)是将弛豫时间与孔半径相关联的关键参数。仅对表面弛豫度进行良好的估算,才能可靠地确定岩石或沉积物样品中的孔半径分布。各种各样的估算方法ρ已经提出;但是,准确性ρ确定方法很少被检查。我们比较了不同的方法ρ测定一套始新世砂岩样品。大多数基于弛豫时间或峰值弛豫时间的加权对数平均值的方法会导致对ρ。但是,事实证明,正确设置松弛时间的权重是解决这一问题的关键方法。ρ决心。几何规则的后续应用建议加权谐波均值(ŤH)。单位孔体积的比表面积(小号波尔气体吸附法产生的)是大多数方法中的另一个关键参数 ρ估计。数量ŤH小号波尔取决于所用方法的分辨率。应用分形理论,我们采用了对小号波尔核磁共振弛豫的分辨率。使用相同的分辨率ŤH小号波尔,我们获得更可靠的 ρ估计。所结果的ρ 该值与通过使用NMR中值弛豫时间和汞注入毛细管压力法中孔喉半径中值确定的值相当。
更新日期:2021-02-07
down
wechat
bug