当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Field Archaeology › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
What We See, What We Don’t See: Data Governance, Archaeological Spatial Databases and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in an Age of Big Data
Journal of Field Archaeology Pub Date : 2020-02-12 , DOI: 10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969
Neha Gupta 1 , Sue Blair 2 , Ramona Nicholas 3
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Archaeological spatial databases have the potential to enable deep insights into human history. These compilations of data are at the interface of data management and data visualization. Yet issues of data governance such as the nature, management, quality, ownership, security, and accessibility of archaeological spatial databases are under examined in archaeology, a situation that can affect data intensive methods and “big” data approaches. Data governance including laws and policies associated with data have bearing on archaeological practices which, in turn, can impact map visualizations and subsequent decision-making. With the growth of the geospatial web and Web 2.0 technologies, there are increasing opportunities for archaeologists and the general public to collect and engage with digital archaeological data. In Canada, greater numbers of specialists from different sectors (research and education, government, private companies) now accumulate, store, and process digital archaeological data. We draw from the OCAP® (ownership, control, access, possession) principles to shed light on data governance in archaeology, with a focus on archaeological spatial databases in Canadian archaeology. In this context, we draw attention to the rights of Indigenous peoples, the legal and policy issues associated with archaeological spatial databases, and a need for greater engagement with Indigenous data governance principles.

中文翻译:

我们所看到的,我们未看到的:大数据时代的数据治理,考古空间数据库和土著人民的权利

摘要考古空间数据库具有对人类历史进行深入洞察的潜力。这些数据汇编位于数据管理和数据可视化的界面。然而,考古学正在研究诸如考古空间数据库的性质,管理,质量,所有权,安全性和可访问性之类的数据治理问题,这种情况可能会影响数据密集型方法和“大”数据方法。数据治理(包括与数据相关的法律和政策)与考古实践息息相关,而考古实践又可能影响地图的可视化效果和后续决策。随着地理空间网络和Web 2.0技术的发展,考古学家和公众越来越有机会收集和处理数字考古数据。在加拿大,现在,越来越多的来自不同部门(研究和教育,政府,私人公司)的专家积累,存储和处理数字考古数据。我们借鉴OCAP®(所有权,控制权,访问权,拥有权)原则来阐明考古学中的数据治理,重点是加拿大考古学中的考古空间数据库。在这种情况下,我们提请注意土著人民的权利,与考古空间数据库有关的法律和政策问题,以及需要更多地参与土著数据治理原则的需要。拥有)原则,以阐明考古学中的数据管理,重点是加拿大考古学中的考古空间数据库。在这种情况下,我们提请注意土著人民的权利,与考古空间数据库有关的法律和政策问题,以及需要更多地参与土著数据治理原则的需要。拥有)原则,以阐明考古学中的数据管理,重点是加拿大考古学中的考古空间数据库。在这种情况下,我们提请注意土著人民的权利,与考古空间数据库有关的法律和政策问题,以及需要更多地参与土著数据治理原则的需要。
更新日期:2020-02-12
down
wechat
bug