当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Family Social Work › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Documenting the implementation gap, part 1: Use of fidelity supports in programs indexed in the California evidence-based clearinghouse
Journal of Family Social Work Pub Date : 2020-03-14 , DOI: 10.1080/10522158.2019.1694342
Jennifer A. Rolls Reutz 1 , Suzanne E. U. Kerns 2 , Jennifer A. Sedivy 2 , Cricket Mitchell 3
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT There is an implementation gap in which more is known about what works to support implementation than what is done in practice. This paper uses information from programs rated on the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse (CEBC), a web-based repository of information on the evidence base for programs that serve children and families, to examine the extent of this gap as it relates to the availability of fidelity measurement implementation supports. Fidelity measures and materials supplied during the CEBC data collection process by representatives of programs rated on the CEBC Scientific Rating Scale as having well-supported, supported, or promising research evidence were examined. Over 30% of these programs did not have a fidelity assessment approach. For the rest, using the available data, the program’s fidelity characteristics, including source, type, and frequency of use, were coded. The extent to which fidelity supports are incorporated into these programs remains variable. No relationship was found between the level of scientific rating and the existence of fidelity measures. Overall, a range of fidelity strategies were used, including those considered gold standard (e.g., live or video observation). However, rarely are these strategies required. Results underscore the substantial implementation gap as it applies to fidelity measurement.

中文翻译:

记录实施方面的差距,第1部分:在加利福尼亚循证票据交换所索引的计划中使用忠实支持

摘要存在一个实施方面的差距,其中更多的是对支持实施的工作了解甚于在实践中所做的事情。本文使用来自加州循证信息交换所(CEBC)评级计划的信息,该信息是基于网络的信息库,为服务于儿童和家庭的计划提供了证据库,以检查与可获得性相关的差距的程度保真度测量实施支持。审查了在CEBC数据收集过程中由CEBC科学评级量表评定为具有良好支持,支持或有希望的研究证据的计划的代表提供的保真措施和材料。这些程序中有30%以上没有保真度评估方法。其余的,利用可用数据,程序的保真度特征,包括来源,类型和使用频率,均已编码。保真度支持被并入这些程序的程度仍然是可变的。在科学评级水平和保真度措施的存在之间未发现任何关系。总体而言,使用了一系列保真策略,包括那些被认为是金本位的策略(例如,实时或视频观察)。但是,很少需要这些策略。结果强调了适用于保真度测量的巨大实施差距。包括那些被认为是金本位制的标准(例如实况或视频观察)。但是,很少需要这些策略。结果强调了适用于保真度测量的巨大实施差距。包括那些被认为是金本位制的标准(例如实况或视频观察)。但是,很少需要这些策略。结果强调了适用于保真度测量的巨大实施差距。
更新日期:2020-03-14
down
wechat
bug