当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Prestige Bias: An Obstacle to a Just Academic Philosophy
Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy Pub Date : 2018-02-16 , DOI: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.010
Helen De Cruz

This paper examines the role of prestige bias in shaping academic philosophy, with a focus on its demographics. I argue that prestige bias exacerbates the structural underrepresentation of minorities in philosophy. It works as a filter against (among others) philosophers of color, women philosophers, and philosophers of low socioeconomic status. As a consequence of prestige bias our judgments of philosophical quality become distorted. I outline ways in which prestige bias in philosophy can be mitigated.

中文翻译:

威望偏见:公正学术哲学的障碍

本文考察了声望偏向在塑造学术哲学中的作用,重点关注其人口统计学。我认为,威望偏见加剧了少数派在结构上的代表性不足。它可以作为对(其中包括)有色哲学家,女性哲学家和社会经济地位低下的哲学家的过滤器。由于威信偏见,我们对哲学素质的判断变得扭曲。我概述了可以减轻哲学中的声誉偏见的方法。
更新日期:2018-02-16
down
wechat
bug