In her article “Jewish Mysticism from Borges to Cirlot,” Erika Martínez discusses the form in which some Latin American and Spanish poets of the twentieth century have experimented, in a disruptive way, with the subjective possibilities of stillness and of time capable of overflowing. Foucault defended, in his last lectures, the construction of a new governmentality of self and of others. Among the many possible technologies to achieve it would be that of the writing of a poetry without words, knowing the insurrectional potentiality of silence. This provides us with a possible starting point for reading the post-secular revision of contemporary mysticism in Spanish. Starting from the Kabbalah, how have Huidobro, Borges, Gelman or Valente delved into an “I” capable of exercising uncertainty and being outside of self? How do they configure out of this discourse a non-subject, unsecured subjectivity, capable of growing even out of its own withdrawal? Erika Martínez, “Jewish Mysticism from Borges to Cirlot: A Transatlantic Approach to the Possibility page 2 of 11 of a Non-subject Subjectivity” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 20.4 (2018): Special Issue Processes of Subjectivation: Biopolitics and Politics of Literature. Ed. Azucena G. Blanco

中文翻译：

---

犹太神秘主义，从博尔赫斯（Borges）到Cirlot：跨大西洋研究非主体主观性的可能性

埃里卡·马丁内斯（ErikaMartínez）在她的文章“从博尔赫斯到Cirlot的犹太神秘主义”中，讨论了二十世纪一些拉丁美洲和西班牙诗人以一种破坏性的方式进行试验的形式，这些试验的主观可能性是静止和时间溢出。福柯在上一次演讲中捍卫了一种新的自我和他人的政府制度的建构。在实现这一目标的众多可能技术中，有一种无需言语就可以写作诗歌，因为它知道沉默的起义潜力。这为我们提供了一个阅读西班牙语的当代神秘主义世俗后修订的可能起点。从卡巴拉（Kabbalah）开始，希多布罗（Hydobro），博尔赫（Borges）盖尔曼（Gelman）或瓦伦特（Valente）钻研一个能够行使不确定性并能超越自我的“我”？他们如何从这种话语中配置出一种非主体，不受担保的主观性，甚至能够从自身的退出中成长出来？埃里卡·马丁内斯（ErikaMartínez），“从博尔赫斯到西尔洛特的犹太神秘主义：一种跨大西洋的可能性，第11页，共2页，非主体性”，CLCWeb：比较文学与文化20.4（2018）：主体化的特殊过程：生物政治与文学政治。埃德 Azucena G.布兰科