当前位置: X-MOL 学术Social Sciences in China › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Special issue: Language studies and methods from the cross-disciplinary perspective
Social Sciences in China Pub Date : 2017-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/02529203.2017.1268399
Huang Xing 1
Affiliation  

Linguistics and anthropology have much in common in terms of research category and methodology. Whereas the “emic/etic” approach in linguistics distinguishes between the social/psychological qualities of the sound system of a specific language and the physical/ physiological qualities of supra-language sounds, the “emic/etic” approach in anthropology attempts to make a distinction between the “inside” view and the “outside” view of culture. Both approaches involve a set of dualistic relationships between linguistic and cultural relativity and linguistic and cultural universality, as well as between linguistic/ cultural diversity and genetic diversity. Due to validation difficulties, “linguistic relativity” has received a cold welcome in the field of linguistics. However, “cultural relativity” now constitutes the core of modern anthropology. The inherent links and near identity of functions between linguistic/cultural diversity and biological diversity render possible methodological exchanges across the disciplines.

中文翻译:

特刊:跨学科视角的语言研究与方法

语言学和人类学在研究类别和方法论上有很多共同点。语言学中的“情感/情感”方法将特定语言的声音系统的社会/心理素质与超语言声音的物理/生理素质区分开来,而人类学中的“情感/情感”方法则试图使人的行为区分文化的“内部”观点和“外部”观点。两种方法都涉及语言和文化相对性与语言和文化普遍性之间以及语言/文化多样性与遗传多样性之间的一系列二元关系。由于验证困难,“语言相对性”在语言学领域受到了冷烈欢迎。但是,“文化相对性”现在构成了现代人类学的核心。
更新日期:2017-01-02
down
wechat
bug