Traditional jurisprudence has produced few studies at the level of institutional operation, resulting in a lack of knowledge about the structure, actors and symbols involved in the modernization of social governance. This is so much so that modernization of social governance is in practice misunderstood as the rule of law, informatization and adoption of technology. The core issue of social governance is the division of oversight and penalty costs between the state and individuals, but we need to call upon a statutory platform to facilitate cooperation between public and private rights. The modernization of social governance involves the use of legislation to provide techniques and statutory platforms for cooperation in an open society, ensuring the reasonable division of social governance information and penalty costs when public and private rights overlap. The social governance techniques that enable public and private rights to work together involve taking a group of observable symbols or organizations on which consensus has been reached as a statutory platform, with all sides bringing greater accountability to bear on this platform in order to maximize their interests and minimize their transaction costs, with no need to inquire further into its particular constitution.

中文翻译：

---

公共和私人权利共同治理的法律机制

传统的法理学很少在制度运作的层面上进行研究，从而导致缺乏对社会治理现代化所涉及的结构，参与者和符号的了解。这是如此之多，以至于在实践中社会治理的现代化被误解为法治，信息化和技术的采用。社会治理的核心问题是国家和个人之间的监督和罚款成本的划分，但是我们需要呼吁建立一个法定平台，以促进公共权利和私人权利之间的合作。社会治理的现代化涉及使用立法为开放社会中的合作提供技术和法定平台，当公私权利重叠时，确保合理分配社会治理信息和罚款成本。使公共和私人权利能够协同工作的社会治理技术涉及将已在其上达成共识的一组可观察的符号或组织作为法定平台，所有各方都在此平台上承担更大的责任，以最大程度地发挥其利益。并最大程度地降低了交易成本，无需进一步查询其特定的构成。