The article discus ses some semiotic approaches to the relation between nature and culture. Starting with outlining the structuralistic approach to this issue, especially the ideas of Juri Lotman and Algirdas Julien Greimas, the author finds parallels between different views on the relation between the natural world and human beings. First, the juxtaposition of Eero Tarasti’s existential semiotics with selected concepts of biosemiotics is discussed. The following part of the paper is dedicated to Bruno Latour’s ideas on nature–culture relation, hybrids and mediations. Then the author refers to Lotman’s notion of the semiosphere as the common space for all living and inanimate elements. Closing the paper with a return to biosemiotics, the author comes back to Tarasti’s ideas and compares these with some ideas in biosemiotics, paying special attention to the concepts of unpredictability, choice and dynamics. The comparison shows that some intuitions, assumptions and theses of these different scholars turn out to be surprisingly convergent. The author believes that the outlined parallels between Tarasti’s view, Latour’s and Lotman’s concepts, and biosemiotics may be promising for further research, inviting detailed study.

中文翻译：

---

草莓，动物啼哭和人类主题：存在符号学，生物符号学和关系形而上学似乎相遇的地方

本文讨论了一些关于自然与文化之间关系的符号学方法。从概述解决这一问题的结构主义方法开始，尤其是朱里·洛特曼（Juri Lotman）和阿尔吉达斯·朱利安·格雷马斯（Algirdas Julien Greimas）的思想，作者发现了关于自然世界与人类之间关系的不同观点之间的相似之处。首先，讨论了埃罗·塔拉斯蒂（Eero Tarasti）的存在符号学与选择的生物符号学概念的并置。本文的以下部分致力于布鲁诺·拉图尔（Bruno Latour）关于自然与文化的关系，混合与调解的思想。然后，作者将洛特曼的半球概念称为所有生命和无生命元素的共同空间。在结束本文时，回到了生物符号学，作者回到了塔拉斯蒂的观点，并将其与生物符号学中的一些观点进行了比较，特别注意不可预测性，选择和动态性的概念。比较结果表明，这些不同学者的一些直觉，假设和结论令人惊讶地趋同。作者认为，塔拉斯蒂的观点，拉图尔和洛特曼的概念以及生物符号学之间的相似之处可能有希望进一步研究，因此有待进一步研究。