当前位置: X-MOL 学术Open Review of Educational Research › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Some new ways of thinking about some old ways of reading: transactional aesthetics, literature and the agon
Open Review of Educational Research Pub Date : 2017-01-01 , DOI: 10.1080/23265507.2017.1365622
Dustin Hellberg 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This article is meant as a useful classroom methodology by which teachers of literature may give their students a coherent rubric for understanding literary meaning and exegesis which can incorporate most literary theories while addressing the basic-to-advanced concepts required of literary students. Also, it will provide a working methodology for the inclusion of certain evolutionary aesthetic concerns as part of understanding literature. Mixing Dante’s ‘Four Levels’ with Rosenblatt’s idea of ‘transactional reading’ and Dissanayake’s four criteria for an evolutionary aesthetic model, this article yields a broad, powerful and common-sensical method of literary analysis by examining literature as a series of tensions (or what I will call ‘the agon’) between Dante’s schema, Rosenblatt’s efferent/aesthetic divide, between humans as natural and cultural beings, and the tension between literature’s textuality and its contextuality.

中文翻译:

一些关于旧阅读方式的新思考方式:交易美学,文学与历史

摘要本文旨在作为一种有用的课堂方法,文学老师可以通过该方法为学生提供连贯的标题,以理解文学意义和释经,它可以结合大多数文学理论,同时解决文学学生所需的基础到高级概念。而且,它将为将某些进化美学问题作为理解文学的一部分提供一种可行的方法。本文将但丁的“四个层次”与罗森布拉特的“交易阅读”思想和迪桑纳亚克的四个进化美学模型标准相结合,通过将文学视为一系列张力(或其他观点),提出了一种广泛,强大且常识的文学分析方法。我将Dante的架构,Rosenblatt的传出/美学鸿沟称为“角”
更新日期:2017-01-01
down
wechat
bug