The aim of this article is to analyze the possible persistence of gender bias in the evaluation of leaders in Finland. Findings are based on two different studies. The first study confirmed that the perceived effectiveness and likeability ratings of fictive leaders (n = 358) varied as a function of leader gender. The second study, based on qualitative content analysis of subordinates’ descriptions (n = 119) of good and poor leaders, pointed to gendered differences in the dimensions that subordinates paid attention: female leaders were both more likely than men to be praised for having, and criticized for not having, communal traits, whereas men were more likely than women to be judged on their expertise. As Finland has consistently been rated one of the most gender-equal countries in the world, these findings can be seen as particularly strong evidence of the persistence of gender bias in evaluations and of ongoing gendering of

中文翻译：

---

“主管”还是“考虑”？领导者评价中性别偏见的持续存在

本文的目的是分析芬兰领导人评估中性别偏见的可能持续存在。研究结果基于两项不同的研究。第一项研究证实，虚拟领导者（n = 358）的感知效率和可喜度等级因领导者性别而异。第二项研究基于对下属对好领导者和下属领导者的描述（n = 119）的定性内容分析，指出了下属关注的维度上的性别差异：女性领导者比男性更容易受到称赞，并因没有公共性而受到批评，而男性比女性更有可能被评判其专业知识。由于芬兰一直被评为世界上性别平等程度最高的国家之一，