In the current research, we showed the strongest parts and the clouds of the speeches of the 2016 presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. A communication control analysis of this type could reveal the role control-characters play in assessing the performance of the actors of political communication. We also concluded that people want to be controlled in an easy but still total way. To make people think that there is a man who is able to do this: it was Donald Trump’s greatest asset. He was able to utter up to 37% more assertions than his opponent, clearly stressed the boundaries between ‘Us’ and ‘They’, and showed greater integrative complexity and objective control. As the result of our peculiar and detailed linguistic analyses, control direction and thematic role tests show that Trump was a man of ‘know’, ‘say’ and ‘take’, while Clinton was full of ‘think’ and ‘want.’

中文翻译：

---

控制，沟通和领导者的声音。2016年美国总统辩论的控制特征分析

在当前的研究中，我们展示了2016年总统候选人唐纳德·特朗普和希拉里·克林顿的演讲中最强烈的部分和内容的阴霾。这种沟通控制分析可以揭示控制人物在评估政治沟通参与者的绩效中所扮演的角色。我们还得出结论，人们希望以一种简单但仍然全面的方式进行控制。让人们认为有能力做到这一点的人：这是唐纳德·特朗普最大的财富。他能够说出比他的对手多37％的断言，清楚地强调了“我们”和“他们”之间的界限，并表现出更大的综合复杂性和客观控制力。经过我们独特而详细的语言分析，控制方向和主题角色测试表明，特朗普是个“懂”，“说”和“接受”的人，