In this comment, we focus on the ways power impacts science communication collaborations. Following Fischhoff’s suggestion of focusing on internal consultation within science communication activities, we examine the ways such consultation is complicated by existing power structures, which tend to prioritize scientific knowledge over other knowledge forms. This prioritization works in concert with funding structures and with existing cultural and social hierarchies to shape science communication in troubling ways. We discuss several strategies to address problematic power structures. These strategies may reveal and thus mitigate problems in individual collaborations, but these collaborations exist within a larger infrastructure in need of systemic change. Abstract

中文翻译：

---

科学传播合作中的力量

在这篇评论中，我们重点讨论力量影响科学传播协作的方式。遵循菲施霍夫的建议，即在科学传播活动中着重于内部咨询，我们研究了这种咨询因现有的权力结构而变得复杂的方式，现有的权力结构往往使科学知识优先于其他知识形式。这种优先级与资金结构以及现有的文化和社会等级制度相配合，以令人不安的方式影响了科学交流。我们讨论了解决有问题的权力结构的几种策略。这些策略可能会揭示并减轻单个协作中的问题，但是这些协作存在于需要系统更改的较大基础架构中。抽象