当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Facilitating Growth through Frustration: Using Genomics Research in a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience †
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education Pub Date : 2020-02-28 , DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.v21i1.2005
David Lopatto 1 , Anne G. Rosenwald 2 , Justin R. DiAngelo 3 , Amy T. Hark 4 , Matthew Skerritt 5 , Matthew Wawersik 6 , Anna K. Allen 7 , Consuelo Alvarez 8 , Sara Anderson 9 , Cindy Arrigo 10 , Andrew Arsham 11 , Daron Barnard 12 , Christopher Bazinet 13 , James E. J. Bedard 14 , Indrani Bose 15 , John M. Braverman 16 , Martin G. Burg 17 , Rebecca C. Burgess 18 , Paula Croonquist 19 , Chunguang Du 20 , Sondra Dubowsky 21 , Heather Eisler 22 , Matthew A. Escobar 23 , Michael Foulk 24 , Emily Furbee 25 , Thomas Giarla 26 , Rivka L. Glaser 18 , Anya L. Goodman 27 , Yuying Gosser 28 , Adam Haberman 29 , Charles Hauser 30 , Shan Hays 31 , Carina E. Howell 32 , Jennifer Jemc 33 , M. Logan Johnson 34 , Christopher J. Jones 35 , Lisa Kadlec 36 , Jacob D. Kagey 37 , Kimberly L. Keller 38 , Jennifer Kennell 39 , S. Catherine Silver Key 40 , Adam J. Kleinschmit 41 , Melissa Kleinschmit 41 , Nighat P. Kokan 42 , Olga Ruiz Kopp 43 , Meg M. Laakso 44 , Judith Leatherman 45 , Lindsey J. Long 46 , Mollie Manier 47 , Juan C. Martinez-Cruzado 48 , Luis F. Matos 49 , Amie Jo McClellan 50 , Gerard McNeil 51 , Evan Merkhofer 52 , Vida Mingo 53 , Hemlata Mistry 54 , Elizabeth Mitchell 21 , Nathan T. Mortimer 55 , Debaditya Mukhopadhyay 56 , Jennifer Leigh Myka 57 , Alexis Nagengast 58 , Paul Overvoorde 59 , Don Paetkau 60 , Leocadia Paliulis 61 , Susan Parrish 62 , Mary Lai Preuss 63 , James V. Price 43 , Nicholas A. Pullen 45 , Catherine Reinke 64 , Dennis Revie 65 , Srebrenka Robic 66 , Jennifer A. Roecklein-Canfield 67 , Michael R. Rubin 68 , Takrima Sadikot 69 , Jamie Siders Sanford 70 , Maria Santisteban 71 , Kenneth Saville 72 , Stephanie Schroeder 63 , Christopher D. Shaffer 73 , Karim A. Sharif 74 , Diane E. Sklensky 75 , Chiyedza Small 76 , Mary Smith 77 , Sheryl Smith 78 , Rebecca Spokony 79 , Aparna Sreenivasan 80 , Joyce Stamm 81 , Rachel Sterne-Marr 26 , Katherine C. Teeter 82 , Justin Thackeray 83 , Jeffrey S. Thompson 84 , Stephanie Toering Peters 85 , Melanie Van Stry 75 , Norma Velazquez-Ulloa 86 , Cindy Wolfe 87 , James Youngblom 88 , Brian Yowler 89 , Leming Zhou 90 , Janie Brennan 91 , Jeremy Buhler 92 , Wilson Leung 73 , Laura K. Reed 93 , Sarah C. R. Elgin 73
Affiliation  

A hallmark of the research experience is encountering difficulty and working through those challenges to achieve success. This ability is essential to being a successful scientist, but replicating such challenges in a teaching setting can be difficult. The Genomics Education Partnership (GEP) is a consortium of faculty who engage their students in a genomics Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE). Students participate in genome annotation, generating gene models using multiple lines of experimental evidence. Our observations suggested that the students’ learning experience is continuous and recursive, frequently beginning with frustration but eventually leading to success as they come up with defendable gene models. In order to explore our “formative frustration” hypothesis, we gathered data from faculty via a survey, and from students via both a general survey and a set of student focus groups. Upon analyzing these data, we found that all three datasets mentioned frustration and struggle, as well as learning and better understanding of the scientific process. Bioinformatics projects are particularly well suited to the process of iteration and refinement because iterations can be performed quickly and are inexpensive in both time and money. Based on these findings, we suggest that a dynamic of “formative frustration” is an important aspect for a successful CURE.

中文翻译:

通过挫折促进增长:在基于课程的本科研究经验中使用基因组学研究†

研究经验的标志是遇到困难并克服这些挑战以取得成功。这种能力对于成为一名成功的科学家至关重要,但是要在教学环境中复制此类挑战可能会很困难。基因组学教育合作伙伴关系(GEP)是由教师组成的财团,使学生参与基于基因组学课程的本科研究经验(CURE)。学生参加基因组注释,使用多行实验证据生成基因模型。我们的观察表明,学生的学习经历是连续的和递归的,通常是从沮丧开始,但随着他们提出可辩护的基因模型而最终成功。为了探究“形式挫折”假说,我们通过调查收集了教师的数据,并通过一般调查和一组学生焦点小组从学生那里获得。通过分析这些数据,我们发现所有三个数据集都提到了挫折和挣扎,以及对科学过程的学习和更好的理解。生物信息学项目特别适合于迭代和完善的过程,因为迭代可以快速执行,并且在时间和金钱上都很便宜。基于这些发现,我们认为动态的“形式挫败感”是成功CURE的重要方面。生物信息学项目特别适合于迭代和完善的过程,因为迭代可以快速执行,并且在时间和金钱上都很便宜。基于这些发现,我们认为动态的“形式挫败感”是成功CURE的重要方面。生物信息学项目特别适合于迭代和完善的过程,因为迭代可以快速执行,并且在时间和金钱上都很便宜。基于这些发现,我们认为动态的“形式挫败感”是成功CURE的重要方面。
更新日期:2020-02-28
down
wechat
bug