The study analyses leadership styles and their influence on burnout and stress among basketball referees, applying a non-probabilistic sampling, convenience sampling, to 61 referees, 85.2% men, 14.8% women. Descriptive analysis, correlations and hierarchical multiple regression models were performed. By applying the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire MLQ-5, Inventario de Burnout en deportistas Revisado IBD-R [Revised Athlete Burnout Inventory], and Escala de Estres en el Ambito Deportivo EEAD [Stress Scale for Sports]. Moderate stress level (26-50) as well as burnout (50-60). Transformational leadership is associated with low levels of stress (p = .003) and high levels of personal accomplishment (p = .026). The developer style, inverse and significant effect (p = .013) with stress. Corrective leadership is associated with low levels of stress (p = .005) and high personal accomplishment (p = .019) and emotional exhaustion (p = .006) of burnout. Passive leadership is associated with high levels of stress (p = .013) and low levels of personal accomplishment (p = .023). As a conclusion, referees mainly apply transformational leadership associated with low levels of stress and high levels of personal accomplishment. They have moderate level of stress and burnout, while there are differences between those at the national level and those at the local-regional level, in addition there are differences regarding the role played, in relation to stress.

中文翻译：

---

篮球裁判的领导力、压力和倦怠

该研究分析了领导风格及其对篮球裁判职业倦怠和压力的影响，对 61 名裁判（男性占 85.2%，女性占 14.8%）应用非概率抽样、便利抽样。进行了描述性分析、相关性和分层多元回归模型。通过应用多因素领导力问卷 MLQ-5、Inventario de Burnout en deportistas Revisado IBD-R [Revised Athlete Burnout Inventory] ​​和 Escala de Estres en el Ambito Deportivo EEAD [Stress Scale for Sports]。中等压力水平 (26-50) 以及倦怠 (50-60)。变革型领导与低压力水平 (p = .003) 和高水平个人成就 (p = .026) 相关。开发人员的风格，压力的反向和显着影响 (p = .013)。矫正型领导与低压力 (p = .005) 和高个人成就 (p = .019) 以及倦怠的情绪耗竭 (p = .006) 相关。被动领导与高压力 (p = .013) 和低个人成就 (p = .023) 相关。总之，裁判主要应用与低压力和高个人成就相关的变革型领导。他们的压力和倦怠程度适中，而国家层面与地方层面存在差异，此外在压力方面所扮演的角色也存在差异。013) 和低水平的个人成就 (p = .023)。总之，裁判主要应用与低压力和高个人成就相关的变革型领导。他们的压力和倦怠程度适中，而国家层面与地方层面存在差异，此外在压力方面所扮演的角色也存在差异。013) 和低水平的个人成就 (p = .023)。总之，裁判主要应用与低压力和高个人成就相关的变革型领导。他们的压力和倦怠程度适中，而国家层面与地方层面存在差异，此外在压力方面所扮演的角色也存在差异。